Carbon 14 and Dinosaur Bones | ttyule.info
dinosaur bones that they have managed to date, using radiocarbon dating methods, At a horizon of 40, years the amount of carbon 14 in a bone or a piece of The dinosaur bones did NOT have any carbon in them. unsolicited) of our new DVD critiquing the popular Da Vinci Code book and film . Evolutionists generally will not use carbon-testing on fossils that they for 14 C testing to be done on them ('14C dating should be done')—not to indeed found 14C in dinosaur bones—see Radiocarbon in dino bones. The carbon (14C) method of dating biological material was Until recent years, however, it was rarely used with any dinosaur bones, for most Western From the book Searching for Ropens and Finding God (4th edition.
Dating Dinosaurs With Carbon – Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs Alive
The age that these groups claim to find is usually on the order of thousands or tens of thousands of years old. The particular example you bring up is one of the most famous such cases. The claims are really quite spectacular, when taken at face value, and therefore should be examined thoroughly. In this answer, I will try to go through this story in great detail, hopefully exposing the reasons why this work is not taken seriously by scientists.
The research by Miller et al. A research team from the CRSEF, or Creation Research, Science Education Foundation, led by Hugh Miller, has claimed to have dated dinosaur bones using radiocarbon methods, determining them to be no older than several dozens of thousands of years old.
Let's look at their research methodology in detail indicated by bullet points: As it turns out, Miller's research group obtained their sample in quite a remarkable way. In fact, the creationist posed as chemists in order to secure a number of fragments of fossilized dinosaur bone from a museum of natural history, misrepresenting their own research in the process of doing so. When the museum provided the bone fragments, they emphasized that they had been heavily contaminated with "shellac" and other chemical preservatives.
Miller and his group accepted the samples and reassured the museum that such containments would not be problematic for the analysis at hand. They then sent it to a laboratory run by the University of Arizona, where radiocarbon dating could be carried out.
To get the scientists to consider their sample, the researchers once again pretended to be interested in the dating for general chemical analysis purposes, misrepresenting their research.
Look at biological breakdown everywhere, it proceeds at different rates. Look at the world from a devolutionary viewpoint and see how perfection has been lost and breakdown has proceeded in spurts and stasis periods. Some of us have lost more information than others, that's why some are at Harvard, but others, more unfortunate, [the same] age struggle with debilitating genetic degenerative diseases like Lupus, MS, ALS, Crohn's and many other autoimmune diseases.
The keys of which are locked in the "vault of degeneration knowledge" that evolutionists are unwilling to open for fear that we creationists might be correct.
Here are some Carbon 14 dates that were rejected because they did not agree with evolution If you do not see a chart below, then your web browser does not support tables - please email me for these dates Penguins Living penguins have been carbon dated and the results said that they had died 8, years ago! This is just one of many inaccurate dates given by Carbon dating.
Mollusks The shells of living mollusks have been dated using the carbon 14 method, only to find that the method gave it a date as having been dead for 23, years!
Why don't we use radio carbon dating for dinosaur bones?
Well, they dated one of those too, the results stated that the seal had died 1, years ago. Consequently organisms living there dated by C14 give ages much older than their true age. A lake Bonney seal known to have died only a few weeks before was carbon dated. The results stated that the seal had died between and years ago. Antarctic Journal, Washington Snails Shells from living snails were dated using the Carbon 14 method.
The results stated that the snails had died 27, years ago. But the ones above give you a general idea. There are other methods of dating. They too, give varied results. Potassium-argon dating The potassium-argon method was used to date volcanic material in this next example.
But these lava flows happened only about years ago in and Gary Parker Image coming soon Volcanic ash has also been known to give dates much older than they actually were. Lava flows at Mt Ngauruhoe, New Zealand gave erroneous dates from K-Ar analyses ranging from The equipment was checked and the samples were run again to exclude the possibility of lab error but similar results were obtained.
Creation Ex Nihilo 22 1: Explosive Evidence for Catastrophe Dr. Steve Austin Has the rate of decay remained constant? The biggest problem with dating methods is the assumption that the rate of decay has remained constant. There is no way to prove it. In fact there is much evidence to show this rate has not remained constant, and that it is decaying quicker and quicker. Just what the bible, and a Devolution and degenerating model of the earth would predict. One of them asked the guard, "Can you tell me how old the dinosaur bones are?Dinosaur Bones Carbon-14 Less Than 40,000 Years Old
If you have any questions on Creation, Evolution, or just want to say "Hi" please feel free to email me. If this is not correct, it could mean the dating method is flawed because the assumptions are wrong, and all dates gathered using the method are suspect. It could also mean the bone specimens were contaminated which is highly unlikely.
Why don't we use radio carbon dating for dinosaur bones? | eNotes
In this particular case, the dinosaurs were dated to between 10, and 25, years old. But since the age predicted by the method is wrong i. But the differences arise because of the underlying presuppositions about the past of the two groups. The museum curator from whose museum the dinosaur bone samples were taken was outraged.
- Expert Answers
- Cryptozoology, Dinosaurs, and Pterosaurs
- Main Navigation
Otherwise your results are wrong. An objective scientist would explore the discrepancies produced by the dating methods. If dinosaur bones are not 65 million years old, then this poses serious problems to the entire modern science guild who has built its house upon the sandy shores of evolution theory.
Grant money is at stake. Jobs and careers are at stake. Their conclusions differ because their bounding conditions and assumptions about the past differ. They are hostile, as the quotes above demonstrate. Their personal god may be Mammon, or job security. They have vested interests in one or both of those things.