Back to the Bible - How old is the earth?
It is not surprising, then, that attempts have been made by Biblical literalists to use genealogies given in the Bible to assign a date to the origin of humanity. Then. Of course, the Bible doesn't say explicitly anywhere, “The earth is 6, years old .” Good thing it doesn't; otherwise it would be out of date the. Prior to the 19th-century, almost every significant Biblical commentator thought the Bible spoke to the age of the earth in a definitive way.
They must assume that forces of nature and physical laws have continued unchanged for millions and billions of years. The processes of decay the dating methods measure must be entirely uniform and subject to the same forces we find in our world now or the methods would produce entirely unpredictable and unreliable results.
So these dating methods must assume the universe we observe now is operating the same as it was billions of years ago.
Does the Bible Speak to the Age of the Earth? – Part 2
Yet there is no currently observable law or process that allows, much less explains, the process of evolution. No law of nature we observe now remotely resembles what would be necessary to take elements in chaos and organize them into life, nor do we observe any law or force of nature that explains simplicity turning itself into complexity let alone the complexity of life.
In fact, the laws and forces that we do observe in our universe demand the opposite result. Nothing tends toward greater complexity but always deteriorates. If evolution is true, whatever forces and laws of nature that account for its occurrence are not now present. There has, therefore, not been a uniformity over the alleged billions of years.
Scientists cannot have it both ways. We cannot assume uniformity in the process of aging and deterioration for billions of years and insist that processes of evolution were at the same time active.
All of this is to say, there is no reason to believe the earth is 4. Since the Bible is God's word, and he is the only one among us who was there when creation happened, I prefer to take his word for it.Secret Code of the Bible reveals that Jesus will return to Earth in the year 2021
Creation may not have happened in BC, but there's no reason to doubt that Genesis is much closer to the truth than the current state of our science. I do not believe Genesis chapters should be accepted in a symbolic sense.
- Navigation menu
- Bible Study Book
- Professor Timothy H. Heaton
Boyd sets out to use verb distribution as the means by which one can determine the genre of the Creation account. He evaluates the verbs present in various parts of the Bible such as 1 Kings, or 1 Chroniclesin which the text is unquestionably of the narrative genre, and then compares them to the verbs present in Biblical poetry, such as that found in the book of Psalms.
Does the Bible Speak to the Age of the Earth?
Using this data, the Genesis 1: Therefore, it is "statistically indefensible" to argue that the text is poetry Boyd Thus, Boyd asserts that the first approach reading the text as poetry can be safely disregarded. According to Boydthen, the text must be read as a narrative.
As a young-earth creationist, Boyd believes the account to be true. However, the young-earth interpretation of the Genesis Creation account is not the only option.
The Gap Theory, the Day-Age theory, and theistic evolution are widely-accepted alternatives. Gap theory is the notion that there is an indeterminate amount of time the gap between the first two verses of Genesis.
Such a gap allows for the lengthy geologic record to harmonize with the Bible. The Day-Age theory is the notion that, while there is no gap in time omitted by the Bible, each Creation "day" was not a literal day, but instead an age - a period of millions of years or more Ross Thus, the age of the Earth achieved by this theory can be concordant with the age reached by scientists: It is noteworthy to point out that Day-Age theorists, such as Hugh Ross, do not generally include evolution in their theory of Creation.
Evolution is found in the theistic evolution interpretation. This option takes evolution as axiomatic and states that God used evolution to create.